📌 이 취약점에 대해 확인된 사실
전부 발행처가 발표한 값입니다. 우리가 계산하거나 판단한 숫자는 하나도 없습니다.
악용 여부
악용 확인
심각도 (발행처 발표값)
심각9.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
악용 확률 (EPSS)
99.8%
📄 원문 그대로
아래 문장은 전부 발행처가 쓴 것입니다. 번역하지 않습니다 — 보안 문서의 오역은 조치를 바꿉니다.
취약점 설명 (NVD)
GeoServer is an open source server that allows users to share and edit geospatial data. Prior to versions 2.22.6, 2.23.6, 2.24.4, and 2.25.2, multiple OGC request parameters allow Remote Code Execution (RCE) by unauthenticated users through specially crafted input against a default GeoServer installation due to unsafely evaluating property names as XPath expressions. The GeoTools library API that GeoServer calls evaluates property/attribute names for feature types in a way that unsafely passes them to the commons-jxpath library which can execute arbitrary code when evaluating XPath expressions. This XPath evaluation is intended to be used only by complex feature types (i.e., Application Schema data stores) but is incorrectly being applied to simple feature types as well which makes this vulnerability apply to **ALL** GeoServer instances. No public PoC is provided but this vulnerability has been confirmed to be exploitable through WFS GetFeature, WFS GetPropertyValue, WMS GetMap, WMS GetFeatureInfo, WMS GetLegendGraphic and WPS Execute requests. This vulnerability can lead to executing arbitrary code. Versions 2.22.6, 2.23.6, 2.24.4, and 2.25.2 contain a patch for the issue. A workaround exists by removing the `gt-complex-x.y.jar` file from the GeoServer where `x.y` is the GeoTools version (e.g., `gt-complex-31.1.jar` if running GeoServer 2.25.1). This will remove the vulnerable code from GeoServer but may break some GeoServer functionality or prevent GeoServer from deploying if the gt-complex module is needed.
CISA 원문
OSGeo GeoServer GeoTools contains an improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code vulnerability due to unsafely evaluating property names as XPath expressions. This allows unauthenticated attackers to conduct remote code execution via specially crafted input.— CISA KEV · shortDescription 원문
Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.— CISA KEV · requiredAction 원문
악용 확률 변화
우리가 매일 저장한 EPSS 스냅샷입니다. 원본은 전날 값만 주므로, 이 표는 수집을 시작한 이후만 보여줍니다.
| 기준일 | 확률 | 백분위 |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-03 | 99.81% | 100.0% |
| 2026-11-02 | 99.81% | 100.0% |
| 2026-11-01 | 99.81% | 100.0% |
| 2026-10-31 | 99.81% | 100.0% |
| 2026-10-30 | 99.81% | 100.0% |
| 2026-10-29 | 99.81% | 100.0% |
| 2026-10-28 | 99.81% | 100.0% |
| 2026-10-27 | 99.81% | 100.0% |
| 2026-10-26 | 99.81% | 100.0% |
| 2026-10-25 | 99.81% | 100.0% |
| 2026-10-24 | 99.81% | 100.0% |
| 2026-10-23 | 99.81% | 100.0% |
| 2026-10-22 | 99.81% | 100.0% |
| 2026-10-21 | 99.81% | 100.0% |
🧩 같은 약점 유형 — CWE-95
같은 분류의 다른 취약점입니다. 같은 실수가 제품을 가리지 않고 반복됩니다.